The reason why employees should not be allowed to be tested for pot by the CBC and several other firms
Prime minister Justin Trudeau, just like most citizens of Canada has been a marijuana user. He even smoked a double after being elected as an MP. It resulted in several criticisms after admitting to this five years ago, but this disclosure was barely shocking. This even made him more relevant in reality, he seemed to be just another average worker attempting to relax in his home.
In 2013, Trudeau informed the Huffington Post Canada that some wonderful friends were invited to a dinner party while their kids were already at their grandma’s place for the night and it occurred that a friend passed around a lit joint which he took a puff. He continued that although he had smoked dope a couple of times, he was never really into it.
Recreational cannabis will be legalized by the Trudeau government, which birth questionable discussions on what workers are permitted to get involved in when relaxing. Significant employers in industries that are federally controlled such as telecoms, airlines, and transportation agencies are suggesting the development of new drug testing regulations in Ottawa for a few employees. Some of the companies fighting for this change are the CBC, Bell, Canada, Air Canada, Canadian Pacific Railway, Telus, Canadian National Railway and the Canadian Post.
The companies believe that the citizens of Canada have no self-control and once pot becomes legalized, will begin taking it as a group in the work environment. So normally, regardless of the fact that nosy regulations have been disapproved, they still require the help of Ottawa to ensure the employees are under control.
The hypocrisy is really irritating. It is obviously a violation of the human right to mandate drug testing. Courts and human rights commission throughout the country have begun to set a high standard for permitting agencies to carry out drug and alcohol tests on employees involved in jobs that are safety-sensitive.
They also stood their ground on the fact that the usage of marijuana is not proportional to ethical quality. In 1998, according to Justice J. A. McDonald, who wrote after passing a verdict that a drug testing policy for new employees by a TD Bank was biased that discovering a couple of marijuana in an employee’s bloodstream does not guarantee ineffectiveness or an intention to participate in work-related criminal activity
Note: that using drugs may increase your car insurance rates. This increases your risk and insurance companies will take this into account.
Ottawa and its regions should completely abstain from this hostile issue. Justifiably, a federal committee reviewing this issue arrived at a deadlock during the spring. Adequate measures have already been set up for organizations to handle deficient employees by utilizing regional and federal work, health and safety regulations. Employers are permitted to dismiss or discipline workers who go against the policies on drugs and alcohol inasmuch as those who have issues with addiction are not victimized.
Contrary to the United States, where drug testing policies have been implemented since the 1980s, a law that mandates the screening of employees does not exist in Canada. (A significant exception is the Canadian soldiers). However, the legalization of cannabis does create an avenue for mandatory testing conditions by Ottawa.
The plain truth is that drug tests are usually inadequate. False positives can be developed from exposure to second-hand smoke or taking specific medications. The samples of hair can also become defective by chemical solutions or dye. Individuals with dark hair are more immune against them because drugs are usually bound to their locks by melanin. Marijuana can still be discovered from urine tests days after the high has worn off. Additionally, a drug test with a positive result does not imply that an individual is an addict or intoxicated.
The safety in the work environment is not improved through drug testing, but assured to eliminate morale. It is also an opportunity of invading the privacy of employees while opening doors for abuse. This is also a chance that these samples from employees would be used to carry out a pregnancy, disability, ailment or prescription medication tests.
Organizations should not be invading the private lives of employees and a reason why lawful cannabis should be considered differently from alcohol does not exist. DUI and getting high while at work remains unlawful. Grownups should be able to enjoy a joint at their own leisure time without sentiments or the dread of their employers turning into true narcs. After a DUI you will need a lawyer in Miami.